Billy Abbott Needs To Change?

I am trying to figure out why the writers think Billy needs to change his ways. Telling the truth in Restless Style is a bad thing to do? Shouldn't it be Victor who has the Christmas epiphany? I mean he did kill Colleen indirectly. Billy only loved Colleen and is morning her death. Wouldn't Victor go after the person who killed Victoria in an even worse manner. Look at what happened to Walter Palin. The town is coming down on Billy like they are Newman Robots.

So

Victoria slept with Deacon and Billy let the world know. How evil can one person be? Spreading truths like that!

So Billy ends up in a car accident and realizes he should change and embrace the Y&R god Victor Newman? "Has he signed over his donor card" asks Victoria in the hospital.

"Daddy could use a new liver for Christmas!"

I think it would be more appropriate for Colleen's ghost to visit Victor and ask him to change.

It seems the writers write the big stars into the corner and then have the smaller names take the blame for the big stars actions.
 Then they simply have the big star say something remorseful... "like I didn't mean for Colleen to die... it just happened.... if you don't get over it Billy we are going to pee on your head all day because Victor was remorseful and that is what MATTERS.. Not your feelings buster!"...
"How is Victor supposed to embark on another scheme if you won't forgive him for the last one.... you idiot!" says's  the town script.
I hate it when the script is so one- sided... Meaning everyone in town is programmed to act like Billy's actions were incredulous.....almost like Robots repeating the same lines.
 Victor's actions were incredulous and really actions of a sociopath,  but there is no uproar about changing Victor. He was forgiven by EVERYONE on this show! Then went off to Belgium with his new puppy Herz to plan another attack on his ticker's DNA. I have to go to Macy's now.